Beyond Statistical Significance: Clinical Interpretation of the Rehabilitation Literature

by Dr. Phil on October 2, 2014

Screen Shot 2014-10-02 at 8.17.59 AMProud to share my latest publication with you, “Beyond Statistical Significance: Clinical Interpretation of the Rehabilitation Literature.” I wrote most of this article while I was in the hospital for a few months. I hope you enjoy it.

Here’s the abstract:

Evidence-based practice requires clinicians to stay current with the scientific literature. Unfortunately, rehabilitation professionals are often faced with research literature that is difficult to interpret clinically. Clinical research data is often analyzed with traditional statistical probability (p-values), which may not give rehabilitation professionals enough information to make clinical decisions. Statistically significant differences or outcomes simply address whether to accept or reject a null or directional hypothesis, without providing information on the magnitude or direction of the difference (treatment effect). To improve the interpretation of clinical significance in the rehabilitation literature, researchers commonly include more clinically-relevant information such as confidence intervals and effect sizes. It is important for clinicians to be able to interpret confidence intervals using effect sizes, minimal clinically important differences, and magnitude-based inferences. The purpose of this commentary is to discuss the different aspects of statistical analysis and determinations of clinical relevance in the literature, including validity, significance, effect, and confidence. Understanding these aspects of research will help practitioners better utilize the evidence to improve their clinical decision-making skills.

Leave a Comment

Previous post: